异常信息:支持当前事务,如果不存在则抛出异常。事务被回滚,因为它被标记为仅回滚
org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-onlyat org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processRollback(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:873)at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:710)at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:533)at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.invokeWithinTransaction(TransactionAspectSupport.java:304)at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:98)
Spring事务传播机制:可以查看如下枚举
总结如下:
/** Copyright 2002-2018 the original author or authors.** Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.* You may obtain a copy of the License at** https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0** Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and* limitations under the License.*/package org.springframework.transaction.annotation;import org.springframework.transaction.TransactionDefinition;/*** Enumeration that represents transaction propagation behaviors for use* with the {@link Transactional} annotation, corresponding to the* {@link TransactionDefinition} interface.** @author Colin Sampaleanu* @author Juergen Hoeller* @since 1.2*/
public enum Propagation {/*** Support a current transaction, create a new one if none exists.* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.* This is the default setting of a transaction annotation.*/REQUIRED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED),/*** Support a current transaction, execute non-transactionally if none exists.* 支持当前事务,如果不存在则以非事务方式执行。* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.* Note: For transaction managers with transaction synchronization,* PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS is slightly different from no transaction at all,* as it defines a transaction scope that synchronization will apply for.* As a consequence, the same resources (JDBC Connection, Hibernate Session, etc)* will be shared for the entire specified scope. Note that this depends on* the actual synchronization configuration of the transaction manager.* 注意:对于具有事务同步的事务管理器,PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS与完全没有事务略有不同因为它定义了同步将应用的事务范围因此,相同的资源(JDBC连接,Hibernate Sess将为整个指定范围共享。注意,这取决于事务管理器的实际同步配置。* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setTransactionSynchronization*/SUPPORTS(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS),/*** Support a current transaction, throw an exception if none exists.* 支持当前事务,如果不存在则抛出异常。* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.*/MANDATORY(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_MANDATORY),/*** Create a new transaction, and suspend the current transaction if one exists.* 创建一个新事务,如果存在当前事务,则挂起当前事务。* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.*
NOTE: Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be* made available to it (which is server-specific in standard Java EE).* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager*/REQUIRES_NEW(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW),/*** Execute non-transactionally, suspend the current transaction if one exists.* 以非事务方式执行,如果存在当前事务,则暂停当前事务。* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.*
NOTE: Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be* made available to it (which is server-specific in standard Java EE).* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager*/NOT_SUPPORTED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED),/*** Execute non-transactionally, throw an exception if a transaction exists.* 以非事务方式执行,如果存在事务则抛出异常。* Analogous to EJB transaction attribute of the same name.*/NEVER(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NEVER),/*** Execute within a nested transaction if a current transaction exists,* 如果当前事务存在,则在嵌套事务中执行,* behave like PROPAGATION_REQUIRED else. There is no analogous feature in EJB.* 行为类似于PROPAGATION_REQUIRED else。EJB中没有类似的特性。*
Note: Actual creation of a nested transaction will only work on specific* transaction managers. Out of the box, this only applies to the JDBC* DataSourceTransactionManager when working on a JDBC 3.0 driver.* Some JTA providers might support nested transactions as well.* @see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager*/NESTED(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NESTED);private final int value;Propagation(int value) {this.value = value;}public int value() {return this.value;}}
spring事务默认的传播行为:
@Transactional 等于 @Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRED)
发生异常的场景描述:
在使用Spring事务时,在一个事务A中又开了一个事务B(即存在嵌套事务),当事务B发生异常时,将异常catch后事务B会进行回滚操作,若此时异常被直接吃掉(即事务A无法得知发生过异常),则事务A会抛出如上异常。
serviceA有事务 @TransactionalserviceB有事务 @Transactional有@TransactionalServiceA -> {ServiceAtry {@Transactional()ServiceB{异常 BusinessException事务回滚}} catch (Exception e) {}}
原因:
因为ServiceB的传播属性设置为PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,PROPAGATION_REQUIRED的意思是,当前有事务,则使用当前事务,当前无事务则创建事务。由于ServiceA的传播属性也为PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,所以ServiceA会创建一个事务,然后ServiceB与ServiceA使用同一个事务,ServiceB出现异常后,将当前事务标志位回滚,由于在ServiceA中做了trycatch处理,程序没有终止而是继续往下走,当事务commit时,check状态,发现,需要事务回滚,所以才会出现不可预知的事务异常:因为事务被标志位回滚,所以事务回滚。
也就是说:ServiceA与ServiceB共用一个事务,ServiceB将事务标志为回滚,ServiceA中commit这个事务,然后,出现事务已经被标志回滚(ServiceB标志的)的异常信息。
解决方案
情况1:ServiceA与ServiceB在逻辑上不应该属于同一个事务,那么将ServiceB的事务传播属性修改为PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW,这样,执行ServiceB时,会创建一个新的事务,不影响ServiceA中的事务。
情况2:业务A与业务B在业务逻辑上就应该属于同一个事务,那么将ServiceA中的try catch去掉
情况3:业务A与业务B在业务逻辑上就应该属于同一个事务,但是ServiceB的失败与否不能影响ServiceA的事务提交,那么仍然在ServiceA中try catch ServiceB,并将ServiceB设置为PROPAGATION_NESTED,它的意思是,ServiceB是一个子事务,有一个savepoint,失败时会回滚到savepoint,不影响ServiceA,如果成功则A、B一起提交,A与B都是一个事务,只是B是一个子事务。
情况4:业务A 有无事务无影响 去掉业务A的@Transactional