@article{2019First,title = {First-Arrival Travel Times Picking through Sliding Windows and Fuzzy C-Means},author = { Gao, L. and Jiang, Z. Y. and Min, F. },journal= {Mathematics},volume = {7},number = {3},year = {2019},
}
等号应该对齐,作者姓名应使用“and”连接,作者姓名不应使用缩写,标题应写成标题首字符大写。
十二、写作词汇
一般而言,未出现在任何学术论文中的单词,不可以使用。
用词问题: (1)Have’t 与 Don’t 在正式的论文中, 这种简写是不正确的. 应使用 have not, do not, cannot 之类. 仅当 authors’ 之类的情况, 才使用撇号. (2)And 禁止在句子的开头用 And。它在这个位置没有任何实际的意义, 因为相邻的句子本身就有相关性。句子中间慎用 and, 除非你有对仗工整的词组, 如: data mining and machine learning。而 data mining and algorithm design 就是一种滥用, 因为两者从语义上来说无法并列。初学者滥用本词的非常多,所以需要全篇自查,并绕过它。 (3)Easy 禁用。如果一个东西是简单的,大家还研究它们干什么? (4)Simple 慎用。它与 easy 有些相似。如果是想说 simple yet effective, 也可以偶尔使用。 (5)Solve 慎用。 只有我们彻底解决某个数学难题, 写出了相应的定理与证明,才能说 solve。做机器学习, 一般无法解决某个问题,所以应该写 handle 或 address。 (6)Novel 常用的单词是 new。只要你写一篇论文,要么涉及 new 问题, 要么涉及 new 方法, 所以这个说法很正常。但 novel 一词就比较夸张, 表示比较大的创新。 (7)Only 把 only 放到一个尽可能靠后的位置。 如: 使用 consider only uniform distribution 而不是 only consider uniform distribution。 前者表示你仅考虑了均匀分布,对其它分布有能力研究,只是暂时没做而已。而后者表示你怂。 (8)Prove 实验结果只能表明 (show) 而不能证明 (prove) 某个规律, 如你的结果比别人的好。仅当你写了定理、性质及其证明过程,才能说 prove。
使用 https://www.linggle.com 查看单词或词汇的使用频率。
十三、句子结构
好的中文 = 好的英文
借鉴法:找 20 篇顶刊的论文,找出各个部分的简单句子,获得句型, 如: The main idea is to … by …在自己的论文中使用。应 按句子出现的位置 (摘要、实验)来分别总结。 例:
(1) Abstract
The purpose of this article is X utilizing Y to aid in Z.
The aim of this article is X using Y and to find Z.
(2)Introduction
The usual approach to show the usefulness of a X is to apply it to a number of different problems and to compare its performance with that of already available techniques.
The goal of this article is to introduce X and to survey its most notable applications.
(3)Related work.
This work can beextended in X.
The initial results are promising, but more X and further investigation into Y is required.
This method can be easily extended to X.
(4) Algorithm description
The factors that influence acceptance probability are X and Y.
As W for X, we apply Y to Z.
In order to apply X to Y, an adequate model is needed.
(5)Experimental results
The procedure was coded with W and run on X with Y processor and Z of RAM.
The findings show that X are the best predictors in estimating Y.
The X outcomes show that Y yield better estimates than Z.
(6) Conclusions
This proves that the current procedure is X and could be considered as among the best available methods.
The results show that X frequently validate Y through Z.
Through the results of this review, it is evident that X is Y.
空格 (1)标点符号后面缺少空格,错误示范: This is my paper.That is yours。 (2)标点符号前面多了空格,错误示范: This is my paper。 (3)小括号前少了空格,错误示范: Decision Tree(DT) (4)参考文献引用的方括号前少了空格,错误示范: Decision tree[2]。应该在 \cite{} 前加一个空格 (5)连续几篇文献的引用之间多了空格, 其实不需要。 这个在某些情况下编译会出错。 正确的写法 \cite{Quinlan1982Decision,Turney1995Cost}.